When DNA recently published Janata Party president and maverick Subramanian Swamy's long article, it caused an outrage in Indian media circles. Readers reacted sharply and so did the intelligentisa, independent writers and civil liberties' groups.
They said that Swamy's article was divisive and it used derogatory language for Muslims but was it just an editorial decision to let Swamy's rant go into print or part of a plan to position DNA as a pro-Hindutva brigade newspaper. The article was indeed in a bad taste.
It also questioned loyalties of Indian Muslims and made absurd allegations on them. I is a known fact that most of the English newspapers and channels are either pro-leftist or pro-centrist. The sole exception in national media is The daily Pioneer, which doesn't have much readership and has lost its credibility.
On the other hand, a large section of urban middle-class and young generation that has been brought up on the right-wing propaganda considers these newspapers and TV channels as Congress mouthpieces. The buzz on twitter and facebook gives this impression.
Though Swamy's article generated heated, it is also true that it was lapped up on the internet and widely circulated. Is DNA now preparing or a new leap. Having remained the third most circulated daily in Mumbai after Times of India (TOI) and Hindustan Times (HT), the paper may now be hoping to target a new readers' constituency.
To DNA's credit, they did publish replies to Swamy's 'objectionable' article. But media watchers say that DNA may be turning itself into a pro-populist paper. There are allegations that the paper was soft on Hindu youths who were convicted for bom blasts and refrained from calling them terrorists. On the other hand, youths arrested in the past were mentioned as terrorists even before trial.
Unlike Pioneer, DNA is a smart newspaper that has a substantial readership in Western India. When other papers can ashamedly be pro-Congress and pro-Secularist, why can't other papers be pro-RSS or pro-BJP or say pro-Hindu interests?
What's wrong in that, after all. Let's see in the days to come if the paper is indeed toeing a slightly pro-right wing line or it was just a conjecture of the eternal commies (communists) among the media circles about the newspaper.
Monday, September 05, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Dainik Bhaskar group that runs the second biggest Hindi newspaper in the country has launched an English daily. After many years, thi...
-
The TRP ratings of Zee News was soaring on Monday as it discovered the cave on an 8,000 ft high hill in Sri Lanka where they claimed that ...
-
A new media watchdog has been launched. The website has been noticed in a short period because of its incisive commentary and criticism....
-
The former editor of Blitz and the doyen of tabloid journalism in India, RK Karanjia, passed away on Friday. He was 95. Karanjia was controv...
-
Is Amul macho advertisement vulgar ? Click for a Video of Ad on You Tube. Here There are no direct answers to it. Vulgarity and obscenity a...
-
The story 'Residents live on razor's edge' published in Daily News Analysis (Mumbai) is surely in a bad taste. Of course, on the...
-
The print media has come under severe criticism for publishing facts about the victim in the Noida 'strip tease' MMS scandal, which ...
-
Independent media is necessary in India, as traditional media houses bow to political pressure and are unable to challenge the regime...
-
On the left is the photograph of Afzal Guru, the man convicted of Parliament attack. You may not have seen this photo at all. If you sea...
-
It's okay if you name a dog 'Shahrukh' but when you write it prominently in your blog post that 'Shahrukh is sitting down li...
Labels
Media
(15)
Journalism
(12)
Biased journalism
(9)
Irresponsible Media
(8)
Arnab Goswami
(7)
Biased Media
(7)
Indian Express
(6)
Indian Media
(6)
Media Hysteria
(6)
Dainik Bhaskar
(5)
Unethical journalism
(5)
Aaj Tak
(4)
Hindustan Times
(4)
Journalists
(4)
Magazines
(4)
TV Channels
(4)
English newspapers
(3)
False reporting
(3)
Hindi Media
(3)
Hindi TV channels
(3)
India Today
(3)
Indian journalism
(3)
Sting Operation
(3)
Superstitious Media
(3)
Terrorism
(3)
Times Now
(3)
Zee TV
(3)
BJP
(2)
Biased journalists
(2)
Dainik Jagran
(2)
Deepak Chaurasia
(2)
HT
(2)
HT Vs TOI
(2)
Media Blunders
(2)
Media watchdog
(2)
Media's Failures
(2)
Sudhir Chaudhary
(2)
Tehelka
(2)
Times of India
(2)
Zee News
(2)
ABP News
(1)
Abhisar Sharma
(1)
Amir Khan
(1)
Ashok Singhal
(1)
Barkha Dutt
(1)
Bhadas4Media
(1)
Bizarre journalism
(1)
Bloggers
(1)
Bollywood
(1)
Business Standard
(1)
Cameramen
(1)
Casteism
(1)
Chaitanya Kalbag
(1)
Chanda Kochhar
(1)
Communal riot
(1)
Controversies
(1)
DB Grouup
(1)
DNA
(1)
Deepak Sharma
(1)
Editor
(1)
Electronic Media
(1)
Encounter
(1)
Extra-judicial killings
(1)
Extremism
(1)
Fake encounters
(1)
HR policies
(1)
Hindi Journalism
(1)
Hindi TV Channel
(1)
Hindi newspaper
(1)
Hindu Terrorism
(1)
Hindustan
(1)
IBN 7
(1)
India TV
(1)
Indian Express Idea Exchange
(1)
Journalism Hall of Shame
(1)
Journalistic ethics
(1)
MJ Akbar
(1)
Majithia wage board
(1)
Managers-editors nexus
(1)
Media Obsessions
(1)
Media and Terrrorism
(1)
Muslim Terrorism
(1)
Nai Duniya
(1)
Nandan Nilekani
(1)
Naxalites
(1)
News channels
(1)
News channels.
(1)
Newspaper War
(1)
Newspapers
(1)
Obituary
(1)
Obscene advertisement
(1)
Obscenity
(1)
Operation Lajja
(1)
Pakistan election 2013
(1)
Photographers
(1)
Praveen Swami
(1)
Print media
(1)
Punya Prasun Vajpayee
(1)
Qamar Waheed Naqvi
(1)
Questionable journalism
(1)
Right-wing media
(1)
Right-wing websites
(1)
Saffron Terrorism
(1)
Sex Scandal
(1)
Sexual harassment in media
(1)
Sexuality
(1)
Socialites
(1)
Subhash Chanda
(1)
Suhel Seth
(1)
Sunday Newspapers
(1)
Swarajya Magazine
(1)
TV channel
(1)
The Hindu
(1)
The Week
(1)
Uday Shankar
(1)
Unethical reporting
(1)
No comments:
Post a Comment