Dalit Monuments in UP: Is Media Biased Against Mayawati?

NOIDA: Dalit power close to Delhi

Even as criticism grew over the money spent on monuments in Uttar Pradesh, Chief Minister Mayawati on Friday inaugurated the Rs 685 crore Bhim Rao Ambedkar memorial park in NOIDA lambasing the Congress for ignoring Dalit leaders.

If one went by the reaction among Dalits, it was clear that her gamble has succeeded. Criticism of Mayawati's display of wealth and the construction of huge monuments under her rule, has proved counterproductive for these parties.

It is true that money has been spent. But this is equally true that for the last 64 years, public funds have been spent in similar manner across the country. There was never this much scrutiny or criticism in the past. Dalits do get the impression that Mayawati is targeted by an elitist and 'Upper Caste' media.

Is it that the press is not comfortable with Mayawati's opulence or the assertion of Dalit identity. On CNN-IBN Rajdeep Sardesai's question that wouldn't the money be better spent on hospitals or schools, invited wrath.

For a Dalit who feels pride when he walks into these memorials, there is no such connection. For the weaker sections of the society, it is a historical correction, something which is needed to restore pride among them after centuries of casteist exploitation.

On various TV channels, pro-Dalit speakers retorted:

"Why no one questioned when vast amounts were spent on stadiums in a country that can't afford to splurge money?". "Why government spends crores on Kumbha Melas?". "Why this question was not posed when thousands of monuments were built in different states for decades?"

"If this is misuse of funds, why not the tonnes of gold kept in temples be used for public welfare?". "Why not all forms of luxuries including ACs in government offices or luxurious stay for ministers and babus in five star hotels or travels in flights not questioned?". 

"Why no one is uncomfortable when schemes were named after Gandhi, Nehru, Indira, Rajeev and Deendayal Upadhyay or Shyama Prasad Mookerjee but only questions are raised when memorials built for Mahatma Phule, Dr BR Ambedkar or Shahuji Maharaj?

Clearly, the above mentioned questions indicate that Dalits are troubled by the fact that projects, schemes and monuments named after upper caste personalities have not been questioned but Mayawati's actions are selectively targeted.

In discussions on TV channels, more and  more Dalits are openly speaking up. They are strongly supporting Mayawati, defending her actions and labelling the media as hostile to her. They claim that even though law-and-order situation has improved, she doesn't get as much credit for her.

The section of Dalits feel that it is for the first time that their heroes are getting the much deserved respect and honour. There is anger that whenever Mayawati displays her jewellery or splurges money, she is attacked but others don't get as much bad press as she has to put up with.

The debate will continue but is it just a question of perspective. Do Dalits feel that for centuries they were denied entry into temples and now they are rediscovering their heroes and giving them proper place to secure honour in the casteist society.

So shall the society and journalists make an exception for Mayawati and be less harsh on her! The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief knows well that her actions appeal to her constituency. That the monuments symbolize Dalit pride.

Perhaps, India not given proper place to Dalit icons till now. Or just mere symbolism by naming a few places after Ambedkar. But the Dalits want more. They want equality.Ter opulence and wealth give the so-called lower castes a sense of satisfaction.

The fact that apart from Kanshi Ram, she also has got her own statues installed, is criticised more often. Each of her monuments has sent a strong political message. Now the monuments have come up not in Lucknow or  Agra but close to Delhi, the national capital.

 The sprawling park in Noida on the border of Delhi, unnerves the Congress. BSP's hold on Congress' traditional vote bank, the Dalits, gets stronger despite Rahul Gandhi's visits and stays at Dalit houses in UP. Understandably, Congress doesn't like it. Obviously, the SP, BJP also don't like it.

But does the media also dislike it? This is the million dollar question. It is a well-known fact that mainstream English and Hindi media is largely dominated by Upper Classes and Upper Castes. So is the media really biased towards Mayawati?

Read more...

Gay or Straight: Karan Johar on his sexual orientation mystery!

Filmmaker Karan Johar's personal life, particularly, his love life has drawn the attention of not just gossip columnists and journalists who cover glamour but also mainstream newspapers.

Time and again K Jo has been asked, either directly or subtly, about his sexual preference. Does media really need to hound any person and does Johar owe explanation to them?

Once again actress Simi Garewal in a television interview asked him about his orientation. And again Johar said that whether he was 'bisexual, trisexual or heterosexual...was none of anybody's business.

In the interview, he said that whether he was in love with women or men, doesn't need to be told to anyone. True, to an extent, it is not anyone's business. But a celebrity has to pay the price of his status, especially, in the world of movies.

Johar is a victim of that. He hasn't spoken on his sexuality. To an extent, media persons are also justified, as Karan has once again refused to clear the air. The 39-year-old, who is also an actor, appeared on the TV show India's Most Desirable.

Despite opening up a bit and speaking about his issues with other Bollywood personalities and his relationship with Shahrukh Khan and Salman Khan, Jauhar didn't fall in the trap when the veteran actress asked her about the rumours surrounding him and the secret about his love life that remains hidden from public eye.

Johar, the son of film producer Yash Johar, hasn't been linked to any fellow star or shown interest towards any actor. As a parting shot, he said in the interview that he didn't mind when people speculate about his sexual preference or rumours abound that he is in a homosexual relationship.

Is the media too intrusive in this case? A single at 39, hasn't he been bothered enough. Perhaps, it's time to leave him alone.Garewal has asked him directly the question which was in the minds of millions of his fans but now that he has openly said it that he won't speak on his sexuality, it's time to stop bothering him.

Of course, you can make up your mind after his refusal. Won't you!

Read more...

English daily DNA faces flak for newspaper's pro-Hindutva tilt

When DNA recently published Janata Party president and maverick Subramanian Swamy's long article, it caused an outrage in Indian media circles. Readers reacted sharply and so did the intelligentisa, independent writers and civil liberties' groups.

They said that Swamy's article was divisive and it used derogatory language for Muslims but was it just an editorial decision to let Swamy's rant go into print or part of a plan to position DNA as a pro-Hindutva brigade newspaper. The article was indeed in a bad taste.

It also questioned loyalties of Indian Muslims and made absurd allegations on them. I is a known fact that most of the English newspapers and channels are either pro-leftist or pro-centrist. The sole exception in national media is The daily Pioneer, which doesn't have much readership and has lost its credibility.

On the other hand, a large section of urban middle-class and young generation that has been brought up on the right-wing propaganda considers these newspapers and TV channels as Congress mouthpieces. The buzz on twitter and facebook gives this impression.

Though Swamy's article generated heated, it is also true that it was lapped up on the internet and widely circulated. Is DNA now preparing or a new leap. Having remained the third most circulated daily in Mumbai after Times of India (TOI) and Hindustan Times (HT), the paper may now be hoping to target a new readers' constituency.

To DNA's credit, they did publish replies to Swamy's 'objectionable' article. But media watchers say that DNA may be turning itself into a pro-populist paper. There are allegations that the paper was soft on Hindu youths who were convicted for bom blasts and refrained from calling them terrorists. On the other hand, youths arrested in the past were mentioned as terrorists even before trial.

Unlike Pioneer, DNA is a smart newspaper that has a substantial readership in Western India. When other papers can ashamedly be pro-Congress and pro-Secularist, why can't other papers be pro-RSS or pro-BJP or say pro-Hindu interests?

What's wrong in that, after all. Let's see in the days to come if the paper is indeed toeing a slightly pro-right wing line or it was just a conjecture of the eternal commies (communists) among the media circles about the newspaper.

Read more...